I. Main points of application or "So what?"
from Acts 15
- We ought to live for God because we want to please him, not because we
think that the way to successful Christian living is by following taboos
or religious regulations, which is legalism.
- Am I clear on what the gospel is and what is the right response to the
gospel? The gospel is the good news that Christ died for the sins of the
entire world and then arose from the dead. The right response to the
gospel is faith alone in Christ alone.
- What is my attitude toward the church age rituals of the Lord’s
table and water baptism? What am I thinking during those rituals? A
ritual symbolizes or pictures a real event and the truth that that event
teaches. A biblical ritual symbolizes something that God has done and
the Bible doctrine associated with that event. It teaches and reminds
people of God’s grace. The ritual itself has no merit. Circumcision
was a ritual; the Levitical offerings were rituals; water baptism and
the Lord’s table are rituals.
- God’s word has been founded upon historical events: God did make a
covenant with Abraham; Jesus was born into the world and was the Christ;
Jesus Christ did die and arise; Peter, Paul, Barnabas, Silas, and James
were real people who lived in the first century and got the church
started.
- When believers gather to define policy or solve problems, they ought
to make use of appropriate evidence and wise people to come to the best
decisions. Then they ought to try to maintain unity about the acceptance
and application of the policy.
- John Mark, Peter, and Paul illustrate that failure in the Christian
life does not prevent future ministry. God continued to teach, use, and
bless them.
II. Summary Outline
1.
Acts 15.1-4. Legalistic
Jews tried to convince the believers in Antioch that Gentiles must be
circumcised in order to gain eternal life; what they were saying was that
a Gentile had to become a Jew in order to gain eternal life. They
contended that faith alone in Christ alone would not work. Paul and
Barnabas would have none of that. The Antioch believers wanted to know
what the apostles thought about this so they sent Paul and Barnabas to
Jerusalem to meet with Peter, James, and the others. When Paul and
Barnabas arrived in Jerusalem they gave their missionary report to the
church and presented the question from the believers in Antioch.
Circumcision was a physical sign, a ritual, a human work showing that one
believed God’s covenant to Abraham. The Abrahamic covenant was God’s
promise that he would bless the human race through the seed of Abraham.
Paul wrote in Galatians 3.16 that Jesus Christ was the seed through whom
blessing would come.
2.
Acts 15.5-6. A Pharisees who was a Christian had become confused
about salvation by grace through faith and about the place of the Mosaic
Law in the life of a Christian. He argued that Gentile believers must be
circumcised and follow the Mosaic Law. He was wrong, but due to the Jewish
nature of the young church, this disagreement had to be addressed and
settled. The fundamental question was whether eternal life was gained by
faith alone in Jesus Christ or faith in Jesus Christ plus something else.
Here that something else was circumcision and obedience to the Law of
Moses. Today we face the same kind of
disagreement: does one gain eternal life by faith alone in Christ
alone or by faith in Jesus Christ plus water baptism or making Jesus Lord
of one’s life or demonstrating holiness by one’s life or ….
3.
Acts 15.7-11. Peter, Barnabas and Paul, and James each took a turn
in the debate. Peter argued based on God’s revelation to him throughout
the Cornelius episode of Acts 10-11. Peter concluded that both Jew and
Gentile are saved the same way that Cornelius and the others were saved:
by God’s free gift—grace—through faith alone in Christ alone; there
was no need for circumcision or obedience to the law of Moses.
4.
Acts 15.12. Barnabas and Paul explained how God had worked through
them on behalf of the Gentiles during their first missionary trip (13.48;
14.20-21, 27). Many Gentiles were saved without circumcision or any other
legal observance. They were saved by faith alone in Christ alone.
5.
Acts 15.13-21. James, the half brother of Jesus and leader of the
Jerusalem church, referred to Peter’s ministry among the Gentiles
(15.14) and said that this was just what the prophets said would happen.
His point is not the specific fulfillment of the Amos prophecy, but that
Gentiles will be included in God’s salvation and that the Gentiles will
not prevent Israel’s promised future. James concluded that Jews ought
not to require Gentiles to follow the Mosaic Law: leave them alone and
allow them to freely believe in Christ (15.19). Since every city has
Jewish people who hear the law read in
the synagogue every Sabbath, the second part of the decision was to
recommend that Gentiles refrain from four activities that would bother
Jews and especially new Jewish believers and therefore cause unnecessary
tension between Jews and Gentiles: do not eat food offered to idols; do
not engage in sexual immorality; do not eat food from an animal that had
been strangled (the blood would still be in it); do not eat meat from an
animal from which the blood had not been drained.
6.
Acts 15.22-29. The church in Jerusalem, including the apostles and
elders, agreed to James’ conclusion. Note the process that they followed
to arrive at the right decision: the question was stated; each side
presented its case; those closely associated with what God had been doing
among the Gentiles presented evidence; the evidence was confirmed by
Scripture; James, the recognized leader in Jerusalem gave his decision;
this decision was agreed to by the council; and they made a strong effort
to maintain unity among the believers in Jerusalem and elsewhere. The
conclusion was written up in the form of a letter. The church leaders
chose Paul and Barnabas to carry the letter to Gentile believers in
Antioch, Syria, and Cilicia. They also chose Judas, a Jew, and Silas, a
Gentile to go along with Paul and Barnabas—presumably to lend credence
to the letter by having a representative from both Jews and Gentiles.
7.
Acts 15.30-35. Paul, Barnabas, Silas, and Judas traveled to Antioch
where they read the letter to the gathered believers. The believers were
very glad to hear that Gentiles were saved without becoming Jews or
accepting Jewish laws. At this point the four men began to teach Bible
doctrine to the Antioch church. Soon after, Judas returned to Jerusalem
while Paul and Barnabas continued to teach the Word of God to the Antioch
believers.
8.
Acts 15.36-40. After a period of Bible teaching, Paul suggested
that they return to southern Galatia in order to follow up believers in
those areas. At this point Paul and Barnabas disagreed about whom to take
with them on the trip. Barnabas wanted to take John Mark but Paul said no
to that. Paul did not think that John Mark should go because he had left
them at Perga on the first trip to return to Jerusalem (13.13). Out of
this disagreement two missionary teams arose. Barnabas took John Mark and
went to Cyprus and Paul and Silas began the second missionary trip; they
would revisit southern Galatia, then go as far west as Macedonia and
Greece. Scripture does
not say why John Mark left Paul and Barnabas; there are a number of
possible reasons. The important thing to remember is that whatever the
reason, it did not disqualify John Mark from future ministry.
Spiritual growth along with Barnabas’ encouragement turned him
into a valuable minister of the early church. Later on, Paul writes
favorably of him in Colossians 4.10, Philemon 24, and 2 Timothy 4.11. John
Mark authored the gospel of Mark.
III. Dictionary of Bible Doctrine
1.
Legalism is the belief
that a person must follow religious regulations or taboos in order
to gain eternal life or to live a successful Christian life. Coupled with
this is another belief: that God will bless, help, and prosper the one
living this way. A legalist follows the letter of Scripture and tradition
in order to gain good from God or show his own righteousness. Legalistic
people work for God's blessing, they confuse cause and result, and they
misunderstand grace. In contrast to the legalist, a biblical believer
follows the meaning of the scripture from a desire to please God.
Scripture teaches that a believer is to think and act rightly because of
genuine appreciation for God. Legalism becomes a heavy yoke or load to
live under (Matthew 11.28). Legalism is against salvation by grace
(Galatians 1.6-9; 2.16), spirituality by grace (Galatians 3.2-5; 5.5), and
the freedom to live the Christian way of life by grace—which is the
freedom to live apart from pressure imposed by a religious community or a
taboo list (Galatians 4.8-11; 5.1-5). Legalistic people attempt to force
their lifestyle upon others and thereby judge and interfere in the freedom
of other believers (John 7.19-24; Romans 14.1-12; Galatians 2.1-5). Pride,
self righteousness, and a critical mental attitude characterize legalists
and perpetuate legalism (Matthew 12.10; Luke 18.9-12; Galatians 2.3-5;
6.12-13). The legalistic person has separated himself from the light load
and easy yoke of freedom in Christ (Matthew 11.30; Galatians 5.1-4).
Legalistic people replace Bible doctrine and the spirit of Bible doctrine
with human standards (Matthew 12.1-8; 15.1-3). Common legalistic practices
in Bible times include observing religious ritual for the sake of ritual
(Acts 15.5; Galatians 4.10-11; Colossians 2.16), observing special days,
months, seasons, and years (Galatians 4.10-11; Colossians 2.16-18),
circumcision (Galatians 2.3-5; 5.2-4), taboo lists (Colossians 2.20-22),
hand washing before eating (Matthew 15.1-20), special rules for the
Sabbath (Matthew 12.1-1-5, 9-14), self righteousness (Luke 18.9-14), and
depending on personal heritage, ability, and conformity to a regulatory
system to please God (Philippians 3.4-6). Current day expressions of
legalism related to salvation include believe plus promise to change
one’s life, believe plus make Christ Lord, believe plus join the church,
believe plus give up habits such as smoking and movies, believe plus an
emotional experience, and believe plus participate in church sacraments.
Current day expressions of legalism related to the Christian way of life
may include right activity done for the wrong reasons: praying regularly,
giving money, reading the Bible, and experiencing emotional highs during a
church service. Legalism related to the Christian life may also include
wrong activity for the wrong reasons:
imitating famous Christians, basing one’s spiritual life on
emotional responses to God, avoiding certain taboos such as smoking,
attending movies, or playing sports on Sunday. Legalism ultimately
emphasizes human works. The Bible teaches that a believer is unable to
contribute anything to God through his own human efforts. Grace emphasizes
God’s work and the believer’s dependence upon God’s work.
2.
Circumcision was a
physical sign, a ritual, a human work showing that one believed God’s
covenant to Abraham. Circumcision is the surgical removal of the foreskin
from the male sex organ. It
began with Abraham and the Mosaic Law included circumcision (Leviticus
12.3). It is a ritual which signifies that the individual has accepted the
Abrahamic covenant—God’s unconditional covenant that he would bless
Abraham by giving him and his heirs a land, by giving him children who
would expand into a nation, and by blessing the whole human race through
one of his heirs (Genesis 12.1-3; 17; Romans 3.1-2)—by faith (Genesis
17.1-14; Romans 4.10-11). Circumcision was established for all male Jewish
children 8 days old (Genesis 17.12), male Gentile children born into the
house or purchased (Genesis 17.12-13), and male foreigners wishing to
celebrate the Passover or become citizens of Israel (Exodus 12.48). True
circumcision was a sign that a particular Hebrew family accepted by faith
the Abrahamic covenant (Genesis 17.1-14; Romans 2.24-29). Circumcision was
a prerequisite for eating of the Passover meal. The Passover is indirectly
a commemoration of the Abrahamic Covenant (Exodus 12.40-51). Circumcision
was never necessary for salvation (Romans 3.30-4.12; 1 Corinthians 7.19;
Galatians 2.3-7). There have been two types of circumcision in Israel's
history. True circumcision was the surgical procedure based upon faith in
correct doctrine. False circumcision was the surgical procedure based upon
works and incorrect doctrine (John 7.14-24; Romans 2.25-29; 9.1-9;
Philippians 3.1-7). Circumcision has no spiritual significance in the
church age (Acts 15; Galatians 2; 5.1-13; 6.12-18). The Baptism of the HS
is the spiritual sign that a person is a part of the church just as
circumcision was a physical sign that the person was a part of Israel
under the Abrahamic covenant (Romans 6.3-4; 1 Corinthians 12.13;
Colossians 2.11-13).